Trusted Partnerships◆Proven Performance◆Built for Collaboration◆Focused on Justice◆
Trusted Partnerships◆Proven Performance◆Built for Collaboration◆Focused on Justice◆
LITIGATION FOCUS
Built Around the Cases Your Firm Wants to Litigate.
IRP does not force every litigation into the same acquisition model. We begin with your case criteria, filing strategy, jurisdiction, and economics—then build the campaign around them.
THE STANDARD COMES FIRST
Different litigation demands a different acquisition strategy.
Top-tier quality is defined with the law firm, not assumed by the marketing team. Before launch, we align on the facts, documentation, venue, timing, and risk signals that matter. Those standards guide media, creative, intake coordination, verification, reporting, and optimization.
Litigation Focus
Four disciplines. One standard for a case worth filing.
Each litigation type has its own criteria, economics and documentation burden. Choose the one you're building and see how IRP approaches it.
Mass Tort
Campaigns designed around defined injury criteria, product or exposure history, filing requirements, and the evolving needs of an MDL docket.
What we screen forInjury criteria, product/exposure history, and filing-deadline fit — before a lead ever reaches intake.
What you get backSigned cases with the documentation the docket demands, plus the data to see where attrition happens.
Where it runsDigital-first, nationwide, tuned per litigation as the science and the deadlines move.
Trauma-aware acquisition and intake coordination built to treat sensitive inquiries with care while supporting the documentation and jurisdictional criteria established by counsel.
What we screen forJurisdiction and statute windows, institutional defendant, and counsel-set documentation criteria.
How we handle peopleTrauma-informed messaging and intake scripts — survivors are met with care, never pressure.
Where it runsState-by-state as SOL windows open, with compliance reviewed for each market.
Focused strategies for trial lawyers pursuing individual or coordinated matters in state court, aligned with venue, evidence, and case-development priorities.
What we screen forVenue fit, evidentiary strength, and the case-development priorities you set.
What you get backFewer, stronger matters — built for trial, not for volume.
Where it runsTargeted markets matched to the venues where you want to try cases.
